RobMed LLM Notes

04-helm-framework

4 min read

HELM: Holistic Evaluation of Language Models

A comprehensive framework for evaluating language and multimodal models across multiple dimensions, adapted for medical VLM assessment

Overview

The Holistic Evaluation of Language Models (HELM) framework, developed by Stanford’s Center for Research on Foundation Models, provides a systematic approach to model evaluation that goes beyond single-metric assessments. For medical VLMs, HELM’s multi-dimensional evaluation is particularly valuable as it captures the complex trade-offs between accuracy, safety, and clinical utility.

Core Evaluation Dimensions

1. Accuracy

Measures how well models perform on their intended tasks.

General Metrics

  • Exact match accuracy
  • F1 score for partial credit
  • ROUGE/BLEU for generation
  • Perplexity for language modeling

Medical VLM Adaptations

  • Clinical finding detection rates
  • Diagnostic accuracy vs. radiologist consensus
  • Report quality metrics (completeness, correctness)
  • Anatomical localization precision

2. Calibration

Assesses whether model confidence aligns with actual correctness.

Key Metrics

  • Expected Calibration Error (ECE)
  • Selective prediction accuracy
  • Confidence-accuracy correlation
  • Uncertainty quantification quality

Clinical Importance

  • Critical for medical decision support
  • Enables appropriate deferrals to experts
  • Supports risk-stratified workflows

3. Robustness

Evaluates performance under distribution shifts and adversarial conditions.

Evaluation Types

  • Adversarial: Performance under attacks
  • Distribution shift: Different populations/equipment
  • Perturbation: Noise, compression, artifacts
  • Fairness: Consistent performance across demographics

Medical Considerations

  • Equipment manufacturer variations
  • Patient demographic shifts
  • Image quality degradation
  • Rare disease performance

4. Efficiency

Measures computational and resource requirements.

Metrics

  • Inference latency (ms/sample)
  • Memory footprint (GB)
  • Energy consumption (kWh)
  • Model size (parameters, disk space)

Clinical Deployment Factors

  • Real-time requirement feasibility
  • Edge device compatibility
  • Batch processing capabilities
  • Cost per prediction

5. Toxicity & Bias

Evaluates harmful outputs and systematic biases.

Assessment Areas

  • Demographic bias in predictions
  • Harmful medical advice generation
  • Stereotype amplification
  • Fairness across protected attributes

6. Factuality

Measures groundedness and hallucination rates.

Medical VLM Challenges

  • Anatomical hallucinations
  • Invented findings or measurements
  • Inconsistent laterality (left/right confusion)
  • Contradictory statements

Implementation for Medical VLMs

Evaluation Pipeline

class MedicalHELMEvaluator:
    def __init__(self, model, test_suite):
        self.model = model
        self.test_suite = test_suite
        self.metrics = self.initialize_metrics()
    
    def evaluate_comprehensive(self):
        results = {
            "accuracy": self.eval_accuracy(),
            "calibration": self.eval_calibration(),
            "robustness": self.eval_robustness(),
            "efficiency": self.eval_efficiency(),
            "fairness": self.eval_fairness(),
            "safety": self.eval_safety()
        }
        return self.aggregate_results(results)
    
    def eval_accuracy(self):
        # Task-specific accuracy metrics
        metrics = {}
        for task in ["vqa", "report_gen", "finding_detection"]:
            metrics[task] = self.compute_task_metrics(task)
        return metrics
    
    def eval_robustness(self):
        # Adversarial and natural robustness
        robustness_results = {}
        
        # Adversarial evaluation
        for attack in ["fgsm", "pgd", "patch"]:
            robustness_results[f"adv_{attack}"] = \
                self.eval_under_attack(attack)
        
        # Natural robustness
        for shift in ["equipment", "population", "quality"]:
            robustness_results[f"shift_{shift}"] = \
                self.eval_distribution_shift(shift)
        
        return robustness_results

Medical Adaptation: CXR-HELM

Specialized HELM variant for chest X-ray analysis:

cxr_helm_config = {
    "tasks": {
        "finding_detection": {
            "metrics": ["auc", "sensitivity", "specificity"],
            "findings": ["pneumonia", "effusion", "cardiomegaly", ...]
        },
        "report_generation": {
            "metrics": ["clinical_accuracy", "bleu", "bertscore"],
            "aspects": ["findings", "impression", "comparison"]
        },
        "vqa": {
            "metrics": ["exact_match", "token_f1", "type_accuracy"],
            "question_types": ["presence", "location", "severity"]
        }
    },
    "robustness_tests": {
        "adversarial": ["visual_attack", "text_attack", "multimodal"],
        "natural": ["jpeg_compression", "gaussian_noise", "contrast"],
        "medical": ["view_angle", "inspiration_level", "positioning"]
    }
}

Integration with Baselining Framework

Scoring Framework

class VSFMedVQAScorer:  # prior naming retained; integrates HELM with project baselining
    def __init__(self, helm_weights):
        self.weights = helm_weights
        
    def compute_vsf_score(self, helm_results):
        # Weighted aggregation of HELM dimensions
        score_components = {}
        
        # Accuracy with clinical weighting
        score_components["clinical_performance"] = \
            self.weight_clinical_accuracy(helm_results["accuracy"])
        
        # Safety-critical calibration
        score_components["safety_calibration"] = \
            self.assess_medical_calibration(helm_results["calibration"])
        
        # Robustness with medical priorities
        score_components["medical_robustness"] = \
            self.prioritize_medical_robustness(helm_results["robustness"])
        
        # Aggregate with domain-specific weights
        return self.aggregate_vsf_score(score_components)

Clinical Risk Weighting

Different errors have different clinical impacts:

clinical_error_weights = {
    "false_negative": {
        "critical_finding": 10.0,  # Missing pneumothorax
        "urgent_finding": 5.0,     # Missing pneumonia
        "routine_finding": 1.0     # Missing old granuloma
    },
    "false_positive": {
        "critical_finding": 5.0,   # False pneumothorax
        "urgent_finding": 3.0,     # False pneumonia
        "routine_finding": 0.5     # False granuloma
    }
}

Practical Implementation Guide

1. Dataset Preparation

  • Stratified test sets by pathology
  • Demographic balance validation
  • Multiple annotator consensus
  • Adversarial test suites

2. Metric Selection

  • Primary: Clinical accuracy metrics
  • Secondary: Robustness and calibration
  • Tertiary: Efficiency and fairness

3. Reporting Standards

  • Aggregate scores with confidence intervals
  • Breakdown by evaluation dimension
  • Failure case analysis
  • Clinical significance assessment

Advanced Topics

Continuous Evaluation

  • Online performance monitoring
  • Drift detection mechanisms
  • Automated retraining triggers

Multi-stakeholder Evaluation

  • Clinician usability studies
  • Patient outcome tracking
  • Healthcare system integration

Regulatory Considerations

  • FDA evaluation requirements
  • CE marking compliance
  • Clinical trial design

Graph View

Backlinks