RobMed LLM Notes

Safety Frameworks

4 min read

Safety Frameworks for Medical Vision-Language Models

Comprehensive safety mechanisms, guardrails, and deployment strategies for high-stakes medical AI applications

Overview

Safety is paramount in medical AI deployment. This section covers frameworks, techniques, and best practices for ensuring Vision-Language Models operate safely in clinical environments. We explore multi-layered defense strategies, prompt engineering for safety, and comprehensive evaluation protocols that form the foundation of responsible medical AI deployment.

🎯 Core Resources

Safety Frameworks

Safety Dimensions

1. Input Safety

Adversarial Defense

  • Input validation and sanitization
  • Adversarial example detection
  • Prompt injection prevention
  • Image manipulation detection

Content Filtering

  • Medical appropriateness checks
  • Privacy-preserving filters
  • Harmful content blocking
  • Off-topic query handling

2. Model Safety

Architectural Safeguards

  • Robust vision encoders
  • Attention regularization
  • Uncertainty quantification
  • Hallucination reduction

Training Safety

  • Safety-aligned pre-training
  • Adversarial training
  • Constitutional AI principles
  • Medical ethics integration

3. Output Safety

Response Validation

  • Medical accuracy verification
  • Consistency checking
  • Confidence thresholding
  • Clinical guideline adherence

Harm Prevention

  • Dangerous advice detection
  • Medication safety checks
  • Procedure risk assessment
  • Emergency escalation

Medical Safety Requirements

Clinical Risk Management

Risk Stratification

risk_levels = {
    "critical": {
        "conditions": ["pneumothorax", "pulmonary_embolism"],
        "max_ai_autonomy": 0.0,
        "human_review": "mandatory_immediate"
    },
    "high": {
        "conditions": ["pneumonia", "heart_failure"],
        "max_ai_autonomy": 0.3,
        "human_review": "mandatory_prompt"
    },
    "moderate": {
        "conditions": ["bronchitis", "mild_effusion"],
        "max_ai_autonomy": 0.7,
        "human_review": "recommended"
    },
    "low": {
        "conditions": ["normal", "old_scarring"],
        "max_ai_autonomy": 0.9,
        "human_review": "optional"
    }
}

Safety Monitoring

Real-time Monitoring

  • Performance drift detection
  • Adversarial attack detection
  • Output quality metrics
  • User feedback integration

Audit Trail

  • Complete interaction logging
  • Decision justification records
  • Model version tracking
  • Clinical outcome correlation

Implementation Strategies

Multi-Layer Defense System

class MedicalVLMSafetyStack:
    def __init__(self):
        self.layers = [
            InputValidator(),
            AdversarialDetector(),
            PromptSanitizer(),
            ModelWrapper(uncertainty_aware=True),
            OutputValidator(),
            ClinicalGuidelineChecker(),
            HarmDetector(),
            AuditLogger()
        ]
    
    def process_request(self, image, text):
        context = {"image": image, "text": text}
        
        for layer in self.layers:
            context = layer.process(context)
            if context.get("blocked"):
                return self.safe_rejection(context)
        
        return context["response"]

Prompt Engineering for Safety

Safe Prompt Templates

safe_medical_prompt = """
You are a medical AI assistant. Follow these safety guidelines:
1. Never provide definitive diagnoses
2. Always recommend consulting healthcare professionals
3. Acknowledge uncertainty when present
4. Refuse requests for medication dosing
5. Escalate emergency symptoms immediately
 
Given the medical image and question:
{question}
 
Provide a safe, helpful response that:
- Describes observable findings
- Suggests possible considerations
- Emphasizes professional consultation
- Avoids definitive medical advice
"""

Uncertainty-Aware Responses

def generate_calibrated_response(prediction, confidence):
    if confidence < 0.3:
        return "I'm not confident enough to provide guidance on this."
    elif confidence < 0.7:
        return f"Based on the image, I see {prediction}, though " \
               f"there's some uncertainty. Please consult a physician."
    else:
        return f"The image appears to show {prediction}. " \
               f"A healthcare professional should confirm this."

Safety Evaluation Protocols

Pre-deployment Testing

  1. Adversarial Robustness

    • Systematic attack testing
    • Worst-case analysis
    • Transfer attack evaluation

  2. Clinical Safety Validation

    • Expert panel review
    • Failure mode analysis
    • Edge case testing

  3. Ethical Assessment

    • Bias evaluation
    • Fairness metrics
    • Privacy preservation

Continuous Safety Monitoring

Key Performance Indicators

  • False negative rate for critical findings
  • Hallucination frequency
  • Inappropriate response rate
  • User trust metrics
  • Clinical outcome correlation

Automated Safety Checks

safety_metrics = {
    "hallucination_rate": track_unsupported_claims(),
    "critical_miss_rate": evaluate_critical_findings(),
    "harm_potential": assess_advice_safety(),
    "confidence_calibration": measure_uncertainty_accuracy(),
    "bias_indicators": monitor_demographic_performance()
}

Regulatory Compliance

FDA Software as Medical Device (SaMD)

Risk Classification

  • Class I: Low risk (educational tools)
  • Class II: Moderate risk (diagnostic aids)
  • Class III: High risk (autonomous diagnosis)

Compliance Requirements

  • Clinical validation studies
  • Post-market surveillance
  • Adverse event reporting
  • Quality management systems

International Standards

ISO 13485: Medical device quality management IEC 62304: Medical device software lifecycle ISO 14971: Risk management for medical devices

Best Practices

Development Phase

  1. Involve clinical safety officers early
  2. Design with fail-safe mechanisms
  3. Implement comprehensive logging
  4. Plan for graceful degradation

Deployment Phase

  1. Staged rollout with monitoring
  2. Clear capability communication
  3. Continuous training for users
  4. Regular safety audits

Maintenance Phase

  1. Proactive drift detection
  2. Rapid incident response
  3. Regular model updates
  4. Stakeholder feedback loops

Future Directions

Research Areas

  • Explainable safety mechanisms
  • Adversarial defense for medical AI
  • Federated safety monitoring
  • Personalized safety thresholds

Emerging Technologies

  • Blockchain for audit trails
  • Homomorphic encryption for privacy
  • Quantum-safe cryptography
  • Decentralized safety validation

2 items under this folder.